Co-Heirs

Have you seen the "trend" going around, where fathers are groomin...oops, I mean "training" their daughters to serve men—cleaning after them, cooking for them, serving them at the table, etc?

It is really stomach–churning. But far worse, it isn't Christianity. Instead, maybe it is God's desire that we teach our daughters to be more and more like Jesus—perfecting their gifts, using those gifts in their communities, learning to speak without fear, and growing in wisdom and stature.

It is true that women, like all of humanity, are called to serve. Men are also called to serve. It isn’t a gender role thing, it’s what it means to be like Christ.

But Jesus called them to Himself and said, “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them.
Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant.
And whoever desires to be first among you, let him be your slave—
just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.” (Matthew 20:25–28)

But mutual service in Christ isn’t what I’m talking about when I mention this trend. Rather, I’m talking about the fathers and mothers that teach their daughters that they are called to cook, clean, and pick up after their fathers and brothers. Ultimately, they are to serve, while the men are to be served.

And here is where it gets interesting. If I name the names of people who teach this (of which there are many) the response will be “Why did you name names? Did you confront them first? I know that they are good men who love the Lord!” And on and on.

But if I DON’T name names, then the response is “I’ve been a Christian my WHOLE LIFE and have never, ever heard anyone teaching this!”

Any reason at all to discount what I am saying.

So I would simply invite you to look over my facebook page and see the hundreds of men and women who have been taught exactly what I am saying—that women’s goal is to be married and to serve men while men are called to be served at home, since they have to do all the hard work.

None of this is taught in scripture. Again, it’s true that scripture teaches women to serve. It also teaches men to serve. It teaches apostles, prophets, martyrs, pastors, and teachers to serve. This is the example of Christ the King.

But not the “I tell them what to do” kind of service, nor the kind of service like the Pope of Rome, surrounded by wealth, power and prestige and calling himself the “servant of servants.” This is not at all the kind of service that scripture calls for.

It calls for us—men and women—to put on the apron, do a load of laundry, mop the floor, bring our loved ones coffee, love, honor and respect one another.

When Jesus washed his disciples’ feet, it was the work of a servant—THAT is the kind of service Jesus calls us all to.

If you are teaching your boys and girls to have a servant’s heart, you have no argument from me.

But if we’re talking about the teaching that ONLY girls are called to serve and that boys are called to lead and to BE served, none of that is in the bible.

Maybe we can do better. Maybe we can teach our daughters to grow to their full potential, led by the Holy Spirit, with gifts and callings and personalities all their own.

And maybe we can teach them that they can live their lives fully before the face of God without fear and shame, whether they ever marry or not.

Perhaps God's will for our daughters, just like his will for our sons, is that they be conformed to the image of God's Son, and thus become fully human, fully alive—without ever having to suppress their voice, their beauty, or their wisdom out of fear of insecure masculinity.

Marriage should allow both men and women to be fully who they are before God, thriving and loving as image–bearers, and thus a fountain of blessing to all who know them.

Why isn't this our goal?

I posted something similar to that on Facebook yesterday and people are losing their minds. I'm being called a hater of God, an unbeliever, a bad influence on Christian women, a pagan, a feminist, a heathen, non–reformed, a Satanist, and so on.

It got me thinking.

Pharaoh lost his mind when Moses said, "Thus saith the Lord, Let my people go." Pharaoh didn't want to lose the work of the slaves. It was, after all, the order that his gods placed on the world. Pharaoh and Egyptian males first, women and Israelites next. Every knows that, right? It is the natural order of things.

But when God said, "Let my people go" it upended everything about Pharaoh's religion and social order. That is why he couldn't bend.

Similarly, even though the Lord so clearly loves and values women as his image–bearers, and did not create or redeem them to be the slaves of men, yet His cry, "let my people go!" upends the status quo and turns everything upside down. It arouses the same fury in the ones who hold the power.

By the way, I'm not speaking of divorce right now, I am speaking of letting go of the control and domination of wives and daughters and watching them thrive as image–bearers of God.

If the first thing your wife would do if you let go of your control and dominion is leave your sorry a#@, maybe you should rethink your lifestyle.

You could, maybe, learn to make your own sandwiches.

She is your fitting help, not your property or your servant.

Malachi 2:16 is often translated “God hates divorce”. I have written extensively on how bad that translation is. The Hebrew reads “Because he hates, let her go…”

It is the exact same word used in Moses’ instructions to Pharaoh. “Let my people go” or “let (her) go”. Set her free. If you hate her so much that she is odious to you, send her away.

If not, then please treat her as the scripture commands you to—as a co-heir of eternal life.

One day, you will stand before God and answer to how you treated her, a firstborn son, an heir of all things, and the bride of Christ.